Why We Were Created and For Whom?
Welcome all readers of this blog. I am preparing material that is a compilation of auto-writings that I have been receiving for over three decades. The focus and intent of what I have been receiving is meant to dissolve what appears to be foolishness about beliefs of creation and religion, while rising to truths about "raw" spirituality that many of us feel in our hearts and struggle to validate as truth. It also reveals how the entanglements of religion and creation are not what they seem. It also brings a new and fresh perspective to what Jesus (Christ) was trying to teach, which indeed was RAW spirituality that did not have the dogma, biases, and judgments that "people" trying to teach Christianity have entangled with their own confusion and divided thinking. The most profound aspect of this material will be a theory on HOW and WHY human beings (as we understand ourselves to be) were created in the first place; perhaps even by whom and/or what.
Most of what I write is auto-writing. The material I'm preparing is predominantly all auto-writing and it astounds me. I'm sure it will astound others as much as reading age old spiritual truths and Biblical stories of the like. It will be a theoretical, rationality and logical ideal on creationism based upon a multidimensional hypothesis. It will include some of the most basic mathematical theories, physical science "facts" as they're know today, and quantum theories, and music theories as a means to validate truth about creation, spirituality and consciousness in multiple dimensions.
These writings are controversial at best. Quite frankly, and if anything, they should be pursued to prove or disprove the fundamental ideologies proposed. For if what this collection of material reveals comes a new truth about who and what we are, then Amen to humanity's never-ending pursuit of truth, but I must remind you that I do not take full credit. I'm just a messenger.
Feel free to inquire about the progress of this materials. I'd love to hear of your interest.
Comment
-
Comment by Train on August 12, 2011 at 9:51am -
Bear in mind... what I offer is theoretical and has a scientific validity.
To Emma: Very good questions. I welcome them.
To Jeffery: Thank you for your curiosity. I will include such theories in the auto-written material, but not now. That would take things out of context, and the context is required. One can certainly ask his or herself the questions you ask, and with it also ask who and/or what is God. Who and/or what do people worship and what is it's purpose and function relative to us? What is the connection and where is the connection and how is the connection established, maintained, and accessed upon request? What has science finally revealed and what has religion tried to reveal. Where are the bridges and where are the breakdowns? What does each individual believe existed before being born and what does each individual believe happens after death? The theories revealed to me are of an ideology with a unique perspective and logic that makes just as much, if not more, sense than the "age old" stories of religions and the stop points of scientific objectivity.
Each person must make up his or her own mind (as we do with anything we let into our minds), and based upon what each individual can conceive let alone believe. What we cannot conceive we do not see. Nevertheless, a curious mind open to the profound aspects of spiritual experience and scientific discovery will undoubtedly find these theories intriguing and possible.
-
Comment by Jeffrey D. Deere jr on August 12, 2011 at 7:48am -
So essentially who are created for then? Ourselves , God or someone else?
-
Comment by Train on August 11, 2011 at 2:03pm
-
-Read the red print only in a Bible. Then indulge me with where the dogma and ambiguity is if you can find it. Black print is not Jesus. Red print is. What in the red print is not aligned with truth and love found in nearly all spiritual teachings? Take Jesus out of it and think of his references to himself as being "YOU" and your own source connection to our infinite creator, which is none other than the gift we all posses. That is the rawness of spirituality in my "opinion". No religion required.
-"Christianity" was a term coined by humans; specifically his followers of the time. Jesus did not make up this categorical name.
-Re: dogma - By definition dogma is at best organized doctrine and opinion. Anything that's created by an organization, that is founded with an effort to align others with it, is nothing short of a cult, and a means of controlling masses, which strips away a degree of free will, free thinking, and freedom of spiritual experience. There are multiple ways to come to truth, but there are not multiple truths. Quantum physics alone can prove that. The fact that there are multiple spiritual teachings around the world that are similar depicts this. Dogma says it's this way or the highway. I don't buy it. In one's pursuit of truth there is no one way other than straight in and through one's heart and to the depth of one's soul and beyond it in the divinity of an adherence to the foundation of unconditional love....love that comes from a pool of something I'm not going to mention as of yet.
-
Comment by Emma Thompson on August 11, 2011 at 10:37am -
What in your opinion do we perceive then to be religion and rawness?
If Jesus did not have dogma or religion why is it called Christianity?
Why not have dogma?
© 2012 Created by Spiritually Raw.
You need to be a member of SPIRITUALLY RAW to add comments!
Join SPIRITUALLY RAW